2009年11月6日星期五
相
小弟真的不知道此BLOG的十數個讀者(有十個我就很感動了)是否全來自我的facebook ,如果不是, 小弟的facebook相簿在此 http://www.facebook.com/photos.php?id=1457222698 , 要先LOGIN
2009年11月4日星期三
09我国教育部对以下9个成语解释作出了正式的的纠正：
1.【知书达礼】仅知道书本知识是不够的，还要学会送礼；
2.【度日如年】特指当公务员的日子，非常好过，每天象过年一样；
3.【杯水车薪】形容公务员的工作，每天办公室喝杯茶，月底可以拿到可以买一辆车的工资；
4.【知足常乐】知道有人请自己洗脚，心里就感到快乐；
5.【见异思迁】看见漂亮的异性就想搬到她那里去住；
6.【语重心长】别人话讲的重了，心里怀恨很长时间； 7.【有机可乘】出门考察有飞机可以乘坐； 8.【不学无术】不要白费工夫学那些不实用的东西 9.【夫唱妇随】丈夫出去唱歌，妻子跟踪尾随
2.【度日如年】特指当公务员的日子，非常好过，每天象过年一样；
3.【杯水车薪】形容公务员的工作，每天办公室喝杯茶，月底可以拿到可以买一辆车的工资；
4.【知足常乐】知道有人请自己洗脚，心里就感到快乐；
5.【见异思迁】看见漂亮的异性就想搬到她那里去住；
6.【语重心长】别人话讲的重了，心里怀恨很长时间； 7.【有机可乘】出门考察有飞机可以乘坐； 8.【不学无术】不要白费工夫学那些不实用的东西 9.【夫唱妇随】丈夫出去唱歌，妻子跟踪尾随
笑死我la
我發現左我男朋友搵援交...
我地住埋一齊, 剛剛先去完旅行. 返到黎都冇一日, 我係電腦 check 到佢有上網搵援交.....我真係好唔開心, 都唔知可以點做, 我check 過d 時間, 係我返工既時候.....
表面上, 佢對我好好, 都談到結婚論嫁既地步.除左佢唔係好同我跩跩.....一個月可能得1次...or not
..之前比我知道佢打個d #96xx 搵女..我發癲, 我問佢當我係咩
佢就話有時要發浭下(精神及說話上).唔會有下次...但相隔都未有3個月, 又比我知道左佢再係咁.....
其實...我係唔係要睇定D 先作出定論, 我再chech 過佢一路都冇 save 係電腦既 msm, (都係因為今次先發現....)
我真係對佢開始絕望......但係我地剛剛買左樓, 佢家人當然唔知....佢地當正我係媳婦.....我又怕老人家會失望,......
我可以點......真係想死左佢一了百了..
===============================================================
唔好死住
等我簡單咁講呢個道理你知
一般為情自殺既女性
大多數既原因係 = 老公出面搵第二個情人 或 包二、三、四、五..奶(仲有埋仔女)
你今次既事件係搵援交 = 叫雞
無女人會因為男人去叫雞而去死。所以你未洗唸死住(亦未有耐到你唸唔好意思)
而佢叫雞既原因有好多,或者係性生活唔得快樂,反正你有勇氣去死,不如就拿呢個勇氣,去改善下你地既性生活,令佢唔再去叫雞。
如果都係唔得既話,你又忍受唔到,咪分手囉,大把世界,洗乜話要死。
反正佢咁鐘意叫雞,有日得到性病你又仲同佢一齊,咁你咪仲無奈。
================================================================
性生活....!?!?.我每次逗佢, 佢都話唔好....之前就話屋企唔方便, 工作忙......
搬左出黎咪又係咁, 我同佢傾過...點知佢反話我比壓力佢, 令佢冇咩興趣,仲話我大食....我想要佢又唔比我...
我話呢d 問題一定要解決, 但佢都唔理我.......有時我都會諗, 搵個sp算啦....但又冇咩膽做呢d 野.....
================================================================
佢出去搵食已經係問題..
仲要佢唔食你....
唉
================================================================
http://www5.uwants.com/viewthread.php?tid=8971981
2009年10月26日星期一
Terry World
As you guys knew , i am now studying in australia now , i saw a photos album called "Terry World" , the photos in it is really...sick...
but , the guy Terry Richardson is actually a excellent fashion photographer , his clients includes Gucci , SISLEY , Tommy Hilfiger ....
just see here
http://begforparty.com/my/blog/Begforparty/14667
but , the guy Terry Richardson is actually a excellent fashion photographer , his clients includes Gucci , SISLEY , Tommy Hilfiger ....
just see here
http://begforparty.com/my/blog/Begforparty/14667
2009年10月15日星期四
AlanTuring受Sodomy Law間接殺害五十年後終獲英國政府致歉
AlanTuring受Sodomy Law間接殺害五十年後終獲英國政府致歉
英國首相於2009年9月10日發出公函, 正式向1952年被政府因其性傾向受迫害的著名數學家Alan Turing作出道歉。
生於1912年的Alan Turing, 對邏輯學, 密碼學, 電腦學, 及人工智能都有重大貢獻。他所提出的Turing machine是電腦學的中心, 甚至是唯一的模型(見Church–Turing thesis)。他把Kurt Gödel的邏輯學語言轉化成電腦學語言, 並把不完備定理改寫成『沒有全能的電腦語言』--抽象的邏輯慨念一下了變成實際應用的電腦學問題。另外, 他的Turing test是第一個人工智能的測試法則。Alan Turing在二次大戰其間參與國防部的研究工作, 幫忙成功破解德國的軍用密碼。有人認為他的貢獻令二次大戰提早兩年結束
1952 年, 二次大戰早完結。在警察調查他的家居爆竊案時, 發現與他的一名同性伴侶有關, 因而發現他的同性戀傾向。當年同性戀乃刑事罪行, Alan Turing 要接受化學閹割代替服刑, 又同時被國防部取消他的參與機密工作的資格。兩年後, 他不堪壓力而自殺, 當時只有42歳
今年8月, 一群科學家發起收集簽名, 要求英國政府正式向Alan Turing道歉, 得到以萬計支持。英國首相於9月10日正式道歉。
Treatment of Alan Turing was “appalling”
See Also : Alan Turing(wikipedia)
But Life won't come back... T_T
英國首相於2009年9月10日發出公函, 正式向1952年被政府因其性傾向受迫害的著名數學家Alan Turing作出道歉。
生於1912年的Alan Turing, 對邏輯學, 密碼學, 電腦學, 及人工智能都有重大貢獻。他所提出的Turing machine是電腦學的中心, 甚至是唯一的模型(見Church–Turing thesis)。他把Kurt Gödel的邏輯學語言轉化成電腦學語言, 並把不完備定理改寫成『沒有全能的電腦語言』--抽象的邏輯慨念一下了變成實際應用的電腦學問題。另外, 他的Turing test是第一個人工智能的測試法則。Alan Turing在二次大戰其間參與國防部的研究工作, 幫忙成功破解德國的軍用密碼。有人認為他的貢獻令二次大戰提早兩年結束
1952 年, 二次大戰早完結。在警察調查他的家居爆竊案時, 發現與他的一名同性伴侶有關, 因而發現他的同性戀傾向。當年同性戀乃刑事罪行, Alan Turing 要接受化學閹割代替服刑, 又同時被國防部取消他的參與機密工作的資格。兩年後, 他不堪壓力而自殺, 當時只有42歳
今年8月, 一群科學家發起收集簽名, 要求英國政府正式向Alan Turing道歉, 得到以萬計支持。英國首相於9月10日正式道歉。
Treatment of Alan Turing was “appalling”
See Also : Alan Turing(wikipedia)
But Life won't come back... T_T
2009年10月6日星期二
New Themes For sonyericsson are being created !!
for the 176x220 monitors models like my Z610i , there is a remake version of i published two years ago : BxW , the new version will be called : bitowa
for the newer model , there is Biyanote!
the alpha version of biyanote will be released before November !
for the newer model , there is Biyanote!
the alpha version of biyanote will be released before November !
2009年10月2日星期五
FROM The Independent Australian
The media’s political correctness ensures biased and unbalanced reporting of issues of conflict between mainstream opinion and minority views. In the media’s eyes the minority is always right.
Even the Rudd Government, which has bought into the row over Camden Council’s rejection of a proposed Islamic college on planning grounds, can’t find appropriate language to express its concern. The Parliamentary Secretary for Multicultural Affairs, Laurie Ferguson, was reported to have expressed alarm over ‘anti-Islamic xenophobia’ in the area, and accused the local community of displaying ‘concerning levels of racism’.
One of Ferguson’s minders should tell him that Islam is a religion not a race. Here and overseas the Islamic world is made up of peoples from many different nationalities in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Europe.There is only one human race and we all belong to it.
Opposing a school or a mosque doesn’t make you a racist or even Islamophobic. You may be a bigot, or you may have well founded fears of the impact an intolerant, exclusive and fundamentalist religion will have on the area in which you chose to live.
Laurie Ferguson even accused people who opposed the school of being hypocritical because they complained about the treatment of Christian minorities in Muslim countries. Surely this is a reasonable argument to advance. Australian Muslims are prepared to demand rights that their fellow Muslims in Islamic countries deny Christians. Who are the hypocrites?
There are no Christian churches allowed in Saudi Arabia (despite tens of thousands of Christian workers in the country) and getting permission to open a school or build a church is routinely denied Christians in Indonesia, Malaysia and other countries where they form a small minority of the population.
In rare cases where permission is granted the building must look like a factory shed and not a church with no external Christian symbols displayed. Compare that to mosques in Australia.
The Qu’ranic Society has labelled Camden Council’s rejection of the 1,200 student school as ‘racially motivated’ and vowed to take the case to the NSW Land and Environment Court. Board member, Fouad Chami said the Council’s decision was made because of a ‘racist backlash’ from a small group of residents. Kuranda Seyit, executive director of the Forum on Australia’s Islamic Relations, said the rejection of the school was ‘a victory for racism’.
A Sydney Morning Herald journalist Annabel Stafford, having embraced the description ‘Islamophobia’ went on to declare she had found a ‘new face’ for it at Camden in the person of ‘middle-aged, earnest looking Kate McCulloch, wearing a large Akubra hat plastered with Australian flag stickers’.
I don’t know whether Annabel Stafford is young and ugly, but to ridicule someone is a poor basis for any subsequent discussion about a point of view.
She quotes Ms McCulloch, a local business owner, as saying, ‘The school is just the thin edge of the wedge.You only have to look at those countries that have accepted Arabs and other Islamic people to see how they have come in and waged violent campaigns to try and displace locals’. However, Ms Stafford has no doubts. She claimed that despite the Council stating its rejection was purely about planning control, ‘protests before the decision … have left the impression that it has everything to do with religion’.
Then, she added. ‘Whatever the truth, experts say the Camden affair is the latest sign of worsening Islamophobia in Sydney and will only add to intolerance’. Now wait a minute. ‘Whatever the truth?’ Surely as a reporter it is Ms Stafford’s duty to seek it, rather than make a statement and then airily dismiss it as not confirmed. On the basis of the truth of the matter not being established but only an ‘impression’, she claims ‘experts’ have made a judgement it is a sign of worsening Islamophobia. Who are these experts?
She quotes two.
The first is University of Western Sydney human geography Professor Kevin Dunn, who for his PhD studied applications to build mosques in Sydney in the 1980s and 1990s and claimed the steadily worsening intolerance to Muslims as ‘cumulative Islamophobia’.
However, Prof. Dunn said Camden was no more Islamophobic than many other places in Sydney. Presumably this previously detected ‘cumulative Islamophobia’ has now reached stability at Camden, where 52.9 per cent of people as opposed to 52.8 per cent Sydney-wide, said they would be concerned if a close relative married a Muslim.
A point one per cent doesn’t sound like an alarming increase.
The second ‘expert’ to endorse Ms Stafford’s ‘whatever the truth’ version of events, is predictably NSW Anti-Discrimination Board President Stepan Kerkyashariam. He agreed (with whom? Stafford?) that ‘anti-Muslim feeling has been increasing in recent years and the situation in Camden will make it worse’.
I can’t blame Ms Stafford for the headline to her article, ‘Sydney Unveils a New Face of Islamophobia’, but I suggest a return to journalism school might sharpen her reporting ability.
How Many Wives Are Enough?
Islamic Friendship Association President Keysar Trad has called for polygamy to be legalised in Australia. He said it would protect the rights of women. Mr Trad’s mother was a third wife in a polygamous relationship overseas. He said women were choosing to enter such relationships and had admiration and respect for one another. Sheik Khali Chami of the Islamic Welfare Centre in Lakemba said polygamous marriages existed in Australia and should be recognised.
However, the National Imams Council responded by saying polygamy was banned in Australia and calls for its legalisation were unwarranted.
Sydney Imam Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali disagreed. He attacked the Imams Council for putting out a statement that ‘contradicts wisdom and the teachings of God’.
The Chairman of the Muslim Council of Theologians Abdul Quddoos, said the Imams Council was not telling the people the correct thing.
Keysar Trad, who sparked the debate, said the Imams Council had ‘no right to conceal the solutions that our faith offers to social problems’.
The ‘solution’ would prove to be a bit of a problem itself, if it was followed by a demand that family social welfare payments should be available to the wives and children of these polygamous marriages. The male of a household of say, three wives, and eighteen children would never have to work again!
Strangely, we did not hear the views of any Muslim women on polygamy.
As usual in Islam, it is the men who do the talking for them.
(from Issue 16)
Journalists have rushed to adopt a new word ‘Islamophobia’ to describe those who oppose or criticise Islam in Australia. It had to happen; for years journalists have branded people who are less than enthusiastic about the activities and claims of homosexuals as ‘homophobic’.This exaggerated label is meant to delegitimise anything said that does not endorse the aims of the homosexual lobby while it escapes any criticism at all. The idea is to close down any open debate about the merits of a situation other than to acquiesce to what is proposed.
The media’s political correctness ensures biased and unbalanced reporting of issues of conflict between mainstream opinion and minority views. In the media’s eyes the minority is always right.
Even the Rudd Government, which has bought into the row over Camden Council’s rejection of a proposed Islamic college on planning grounds, can’t find appropriate language to express its concern. The Parliamentary Secretary for Multicultural Affairs, Laurie Ferguson, was reported to have expressed alarm over ‘anti-Islamic xenophobia’ in the area, and accused the local community of displaying ‘concerning levels of racism’.
One of Ferguson’s minders should tell him that Islam is a religion not a race. Here and overseas the Islamic world is made up of peoples from many different nationalities in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Europe.There is only one human race and we all belong to it.
Opposing a school or a mosque doesn’t make you a racist or even Islamophobic. You may be a bigot, or you may have well founded fears of the impact an intolerant, exclusive and fundamentalist religion will have on the area in which you chose to live.
Laurie Ferguson even accused people who opposed the school of being hypocritical because they complained about the treatment of Christian minorities in Muslim countries. Surely this is a reasonable argument to advance. Australian Muslims are prepared to demand rights that their fellow Muslims in Islamic countries deny Christians. Who are the hypocrites?
There are no Christian churches allowed in Saudi Arabia (despite tens of thousands of Christian workers in the country) and getting permission to open a school or build a church is routinely denied Christians in Indonesia, Malaysia and other countries where they form a small minority of the population.
In rare cases where permission is granted the building must look like a factory shed and not a church with no external Christian symbols displayed. Compare that to mosques in Australia.
The Qu’ranic Society has labelled Camden Council’s rejection of the 1,200 student school as ‘racially motivated’ and vowed to take the case to the NSW Land and Environment Court. Board member, Fouad Chami said the Council’s decision was made because of a ‘racist backlash’ from a small group of residents. Kuranda Seyit, executive director of the Forum on Australia’s Islamic Relations, said the rejection of the school was ‘a victory for racism’.
A Sydney Morning Herald journalist Annabel Stafford, having embraced the description ‘Islamophobia’ went on to declare she had found a ‘new face’ for it at Camden in the person of ‘middle-aged, earnest looking Kate McCulloch, wearing a large Akubra hat plastered with Australian flag stickers’.
I don’t know whether Annabel Stafford is young and ugly, but to ridicule someone is a poor basis for any subsequent discussion about a point of view.
She quotes Ms McCulloch, a local business owner, as saying, ‘The school is just the thin edge of the wedge.You only have to look at those countries that have accepted Arabs and other Islamic people to see how they have come in and waged violent campaigns to try and displace locals’. However, Ms Stafford has no doubts. She claimed that despite the Council stating its rejection was purely about planning control, ‘protests before the decision … have left the impression that it has everything to do with religion’.
Then, she added. ‘Whatever the truth, experts say the Camden affair is the latest sign of worsening Islamophobia in Sydney and will only add to intolerance’. Now wait a minute. ‘Whatever the truth?’ Surely as a reporter it is Ms Stafford’s duty to seek it, rather than make a statement and then airily dismiss it as not confirmed. On the basis of the truth of the matter not being established but only an ‘impression’, she claims ‘experts’ have made a judgement it is a sign of worsening Islamophobia. Who are these experts?
She quotes two.
The first is University of Western Sydney human geography Professor Kevin Dunn, who for his PhD studied applications to build mosques in Sydney in the 1980s and 1990s and claimed the steadily worsening intolerance to Muslims as ‘cumulative Islamophobia’.
However, Prof. Dunn said Camden was no more Islamophobic than many other places in Sydney. Presumably this previously detected ‘cumulative Islamophobia’ has now reached stability at Camden, where 52.9 per cent of people as opposed to 52.8 per cent Sydney-wide, said they would be concerned if a close relative married a Muslim.
A point one per cent doesn’t sound like an alarming increase.
The second ‘expert’ to endorse Ms Stafford’s ‘whatever the truth’ version of events, is predictably NSW Anti-Discrimination Board President Stepan Kerkyashariam. He agreed (with whom? Stafford?) that ‘anti-Muslim feeling has been increasing in recent years and the situation in Camden will make it worse’.
I can’t blame Ms Stafford for the headline to her article, ‘Sydney Unveils a New Face of Islamophobia’, but I suggest a return to journalism school might sharpen her reporting ability.
How Many Wives Are Enough?
Islamic Friendship Association President Keysar Trad has called for polygamy to be legalised in Australia. He said it would protect the rights of women. Mr Trad’s mother was a third wife in a polygamous relationship overseas. He said women were choosing to enter such relationships and had admiration and respect for one another. Sheik Khali Chami of the Islamic Welfare Centre in Lakemba said polygamous marriages existed in Australia and should be recognised.
However, the National Imams Council responded by saying polygamy was banned in Australia and calls for its legalisation were unwarranted.
Sydney Imam Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali disagreed. He attacked the Imams Council for putting out a statement that ‘contradicts wisdom and the teachings of God’.
The Chairman of the Muslim Council of Theologians Abdul Quddoos, said the Imams Council was not telling the people the correct thing.
Keysar Trad, who sparked the debate, said the Imams Council had ‘no right to conceal the solutions that our faith offers to social problems’.
The ‘solution’ would prove to be a bit of a problem itself, if it was followed by a demand that family social welfare payments should be available to the wives and children of these polygamous marriages. The male of a household of say, three wives, and eighteen children would never have to work again!
Strangely, we did not hear the views of any Muslim women on polygamy.
As usual in Islam, it is the men who do the talking for them.
2009年9月30日星期三
For telling you how to live as a woman
http://latifah.wordpress.com/2006/12/22/happy-birthday-to-me/
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ME!
December 22, 2006 latifah
Tomorrow will be my birthday
It will be completion to 25 years of my pains, struggles, successes and sufferings. I should be happy and over the moon. I am now a big girl plus for the fact that my birthday is almost as the same with the SON of MAN himself should be a cherry on top. I have had a very good and bad days of my life just like anybody else in this world. It is only fair and the same time hurting, heartbreaking and overwhelming. Overwhelming that i have made it up to this far after all I’ve been through. (We all go through our daily moments but let me share mine with you):
Not so long ago i discovered that i was HIV+. I was attacked and raped far too many
times in order for me to contract the virus. You see, the reason for that is that i am a
woman who identifies as lesbian because of my involvement with a woman. My
attackers and different rapists did so to show me how it is to be a woman. I often
wonder and ask myself if all women including those who aren’t homosexual got raped
in order for them to remain and stay “women”.
The irony to it all is that im still that lesbian bitch whom they wanted to show how it is
to be a woman.It is worse cause the only thing they have done is install hate, fear and
anger towards men in general. The most unforgiving thing that they have done and
wont take away is that they have poisoned my blood with their HIV. I am saying this
because with the rapes i can go for counsellings until it is dealt with maybe. But it is
different when each time i have to swallow a the HIV medication. Even then i had to
make a choice as to whether i remain at home dying and denying the fact that i was
infected or do something about it. So being the person i am i chose to stand up and act
on it. Another reason was that because we are mostly failed and judged by those we
are relying and depending upon because of our sexuality. It may not be right to some
but imagine having to go and lay a charge only for you not to be taken seriously by the
police who let you know that you are also a “man”. And again by those whom are
suppose to be protecting and supporting you as a sister. They are the ones who later
tell you it is because you befriended your rapist that is why maybe you got raped and
attacked by him (Your family). Yes, it is true i had befriended him but don’t you think
if i had known i had befriended a neighbor who is a rapist i would have stayed away?
Not so long ago our country was celebrating the 16 Days of activism against women&
child abuse. And to let you know this-I don’t know how many times I’ve denied
myself sleep at nights to be part of the women who marched this country’s streets for
people to recognized the needs of women to be taken seriously.
I was there when it all begun.The Jacob Zuma rape trial with my purple one in nine
campaign T-shirt shouting support the 1 in 9 women who speak out! against their
rapists. Still i was Lesbian. I cannot begin to count and calculate the times i have
referred rape survivors who needed a shelter and a place to stay. THROUGH IT ALL I
HAVE BEEN THE LESBIAN THAT I AM. To me it has never been about their
sexuality but the fact that a woman is a woman. Hurt is hurt. As much as rape is rape
regardless of my sexual preference. It is like it is AIDS is AIDS is AIDS thats why i
stand up for solidarity with all women.
這位女Blogger兼詩人己經於07年3月離開世界，死於因為多次由不同人基於她是女同性戀者而進行的強姦引致的愛滋病感染
http://zh.globalvoicesonline.org/hant/2009/08/18/3951/
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ME!
December 22, 2006 latifah
Tomorrow will be my birthday
It will be completion to 25 years of my pains, struggles, successes and sufferings. I should be happy and over the moon. I am now a big girl plus for the fact that my birthday is almost as the same with the SON of MAN himself should be a cherry on top. I have had a very good and bad days of my life just like anybody else in this world. It is only fair and the same time hurting, heartbreaking and overwhelming. Overwhelming that i have made it up to this far after all I’ve been through. (We all go through our daily moments but let me share mine with you):
Not so long ago i discovered that i was HIV+. I was attacked and raped far too many
times in order for me to contract the virus. You see, the reason for that is that i am a
woman who identifies as lesbian because of my involvement with a woman. My
attackers and different rapists did so to show me how it is to be a woman. I often
wonder and ask myself if all women including those who aren’t homosexual got raped
in order for them to remain and stay “women”.
The irony to it all is that im still that lesbian bitch whom they wanted to show how it is
to be a woman.It is worse cause the only thing they have done is install hate, fear and
anger towards men in general. The most unforgiving thing that they have done and
wont take away is that they have poisoned my blood with their HIV. I am saying this
because with the rapes i can go for counsellings until it is dealt with maybe. But it is
different when each time i have to swallow a the HIV medication. Even then i had to
make a choice as to whether i remain at home dying and denying the fact that i was
infected or do something about it. So being the person i am i chose to stand up and act
on it. Another reason was that because we are mostly failed and judged by those we
are relying and depending upon because of our sexuality. It may not be right to some
but imagine having to go and lay a charge only for you not to be taken seriously by the
police who let you know that you are also a “man”. And again by those whom are
suppose to be protecting and supporting you as a sister. They are the ones who later
tell you it is because you befriended your rapist that is why maybe you got raped and
attacked by him (Your family). Yes, it is true i had befriended him but don’t you think
if i had known i had befriended a neighbor who is a rapist i would have stayed away?
Not so long ago our country was celebrating the 16 Days of activism against women&
child abuse. And to let you know this-I don’t know how many times I’ve denied
myself sleep at nights to be part of the women who marched this country’s streets for
people to recognized the needs of women to be taken seriously.
I was there when it all begun.The Jacob Zuma rape trial with my purple one in nine
campaign T-shirt shouting support the 1 in 9 women who speak out! against their
rapists. Still i was Lesbian. I cannot begin to count and calculate the times i have
referred rape survivors who needed a shelter and a place to stay. THROUGH IT ALL I
HAVE BEEN THE LESBIAN THAT I AM. To me it has never been about their
sexuality but the fact that a woman is a woman. Hurt is hurt. As much as rape is rape
regardless of my sexual preference. It is like it is AIDS is AIDS is AIDS thats why i
stand up for solidarity with all women.
這位女Blogger兼詩人己經於07年3月離開世界，死於因為多次由不同人基於她是女同性戀者而進行的強姦引致的愛滋病感染
http://zh.globalvoicesonline.org/hant/2009/08/18/3951/
2009年8月10日星期一
諗極都唔明的周秀娜之五百蚊小朋友
去香港的個多小時船程中，我好努力咁試圖說服白己個小朋友用五百蚊買個攬枕係合理的，但係我做唔到:
"記者再問：「咁你會唔會攬住佢瞓呀！」
小朋友話：「屋企人講到明唔畀拎入房，所以我會放係廳到！」"
咁即係「鹹濕仔」講唔通，退十步，佢搏屋企人會忘記禁令之類 , 咁但係我地而家講緊唔係五十蚊，係五百蚊，我自認係咸蟲，但莫講周秀娜三點式，松島楓假人性玩具我都唔肯俾五百蚊 ,五百蚊我大約要儲半個月，小朋友話自己儲左三四個月.我咁大個仔,買過最貴既咸野，只不過係本百幾蚊既小說，所以我真係唔明
「偶像」又點講都唔通，除非佢打算變牲
"記者再問：「咁你會唔會攬住佢瞓呀！」
小朋友話：「屋企人講到明唔畀拎入房，所以我會放係廳到！」"
咁即係「鹹濕仔」講唔通，退十步，佢搏屋企人會忘記禁令之類 , 咁但係我地而家講緊唔係五十蚊，係五百蚊，我自認係咸蟲，但莫講周秀娜三點式，松島楓假人性玩具我都唔肯俾五百蚊 ,五百蚊我大約要儲半個月，小朋友話自己儲左三四個月.我咁大個仔,買過最貴既咸野，只不過係本百幾蚊既小說，所以我真係唔明
「偶像」又點講都唔通，除非佢打算變牲
膠人與謬論，o靚模篇
以下報道取自星島日報
係入正題之前，我要讚下我塊Wacom繪圖板，而家我寫字仲怏過打字，支筆真係好好楂，同埋再講多次，觸感直係好似紙
名模靚媽群起聲討周秀娜色情攬枕 汪詩詩怒斥:令人反感應受監管
星島日報報道周秀娜在動漫節推出性感人形攬枕，連13歲的小朋友都前往購買，令周秀娜再度成為抨擊對象。已是母親級的名模歐陽妙芝和馬詩慧，直斥時下o靚模的不良歪風，矛頭直指周秀娜影響模特兒聲譽。甄子丹太太汪詩詩更認為「人形攬枕」像性玩具。
一個攬枕又係性玩具，禁左攬枕,係咪要禁埋比基尼?然後到青瓜茄子蕉，跟住係杯麵，你地理想中的社會其實係伊斯蘭國家，玩一夫多妻制，女人要包頭先可以出街，請即聯絡佢地
其實攬枕形狀好似陰莖,禁！
所有香腸，禁!
所有球，禁！
阿拉伯數目字0,8,6,9,禁！
到最後，人，禁！
係入正題之前，我要讚下我塊Wacom繪圖板，而家我寫字仲怏過打字，支筆真係好好楂，同埋再講多次，觸感直係好似紙
名模靚媽群起聲討周秀娜色情攬枕 汪詩詩怒斥:令人反感應受監管
星島日報報道周秀娜在動漫節推出性感人形攬枕，連13歲的小朋友都前往購買，令周秀娜再度成為抨擊對象。已是母親級的名模歐陽妙芝和馬詩慧，直斥時下o靚模的不良歪風，矛頭直指周秀娜影響模特兒聲譽。甄子丹太太汪詩詩更認為「人形攬枕」像性玩具。
一個攬枕又係性玩具，禁左攬枕,係咪要禁埋比基尼?然後到青瓜茄子蕉，跟住係杯麵，你地理想中的社會其實係伊斯蘭國家，玩一夫多妻制，女人要包頭先可以出街，請即聯絡佢地
其實攬枕形狀好似陰莖,禁！
所有香腸，禁!
所有球，禁！
阿拉伯數目字0,8,6,9,禁！
到最後，人，禁！
2009年8月4日星期二
2009年8月3日星期一
2009年8月1日星期六
2009年7月25日星期六
Wallpapers by Alpaca Photos
這週內筆者會以Alpaca Photos的名義推出約十張的1024x600(即是10吋Netbook的大小)的Wallpaper,請大家好好期待吧
至於AlpacaPhotos , 則會是一個要求稍高的攝影同好會,有意加入者請留言
至於AlpacaPhotos , 則會是一個要求稍高的攝影同好會,有意加入者請留言
這一切都是上主所作所為
這句說話來自聖詠集(22,32)，澳門主教座祈禱團"節綠"左拿來造Bookmark，筆者發現呢句簡直係萬能回答/回應
例1 問 x+1=0 , x=?
答 x=0
問 吓?
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
例2 問 你覺得係中小學同糼稚園抽尿驗毒係咪好提意?
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
例3 問 點解全職獵人仲未出新書嘅?
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
例4 問 琴日你係水坑尾咀嗰個女仔係邊個?
答1 Michael Jackson
問 吓?
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
答2 無呀
問 我明明見到你同個着得好性感女仔咀喎
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
例5 問 先生你仲未俾錢喎!
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
好極了！
例1 問 x+1=0 , x=?
答 x=0
問 吓?
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
例2 問 你覺得係中小學同糼稚園抽尿驗毒係咪好提意?
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
例3 問 點解全職獵人仲未出新書嘅?
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
例4 問 琴日你係水坑尾咀嗰個女仔係邊個?
答1 Michael Jackson
問 吓?
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
答2 無呀
問 我明明見到你同個着得好性感女仔咀喎
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
例5 問 先生你仲未俾錢喎!
答 這一切都是上主所作所為
好極了！
2009年7月17日星期五
2009年7月15日星期三
死都唔俾?
人權,筆者認為係包括去死的權利的,但有趣的是,原來各地法律都在不知有意或無意間將自殺列為犯法,以澳門刑法典為例,第一百二十八條 : 殺人之定義為 :
原來真係連去死都唔俾...
順帶一提,有本書叫完全自殺手冊,教你用科學方法自我了斷,作者於書中表示他並不會特別鼓勵讀者自殺,只是希望每一個人都自殺的權利並且有確保自己能夠死去的手段.結果該書被各國列為禁書
無論你信D乜,其他人理應不受你的信仰影響而享有自由,有D反對安樂死嘅理論好白痴,例如"佢第時可能會後悔呢",咁容易後悔,又唔見你唔生仔,唔食飯(第時可能會後悔,其實當時應該食面)
殺人者,處十年至二十年徒刑,那個人,法律上可以是自己,但如果你真係自殺,就屬於第一百三十二條:應被害人要求而殺人,因為此條定義為
受被殺之人認真,堅決及明示之請求所驅使而殺之者,處最高五年徒刑,亦無排除殺與被殺者為同一個人.
原來真係連去死都唔俾...
順帶一提,有本書叫完全自殺手冊,教你用科學方法自我了斷,作者於書中表示他並不會特別鼓勵讀者自殺,只是希望每一個人都自殺的權利並且有確保自己能夠死去的手段.結果該書被各國列為禁書
無論你信D乜,其他人理應不受你的信仰影響而享有自由,有D反對安樂死嘅理論好白痴,例如"佢第時可能會後悔呢",咁容易後悔,又唔見你唔生仔,唔食飯(第時可能會後悔,其實當時應該食面)
2009年7月13日星期一
我心中的黑名單
Yahoo! (中國記者事件,出賣email持有人的身份予PRC GOV,最後該記者被判入獄)
Canon (至09年十月仍以成龍為中國市埸之代言人)
Baidu (多次以嚴重有違良如之手法打擊Google)
Cisco (又名思科，向PRC GOV提供過濾網絡之技術)
Kaspersky(雇用支持愚民者:成龍 其CEO呼吁采取网络实名制http://www.cnbeta.com/articles/95740.htm)
=============================================================================
*AgReserves Inc 美洲最大的核果生產廠商
*Beneficial Life 保險公司——約16億美元資產
*Bonneville International Corporation——美國第14大連鎖廣播電台公司
*Deseret Morning News（德撒律早報）——一份美國猶他州日報，該州第二大日報
*Deseret Cattle and Citrus Ranch （德撒律牧牛及柑橘農場），在佛羅里達州 Orlando （奧蘭多）——全世界最大的牧牛農場（1260平方公里），農場土地價值估計約8.58億美元
*Farmland Reserve, Inc
以上屬摩門教所有,該教20世紀後期強烈反對美國憲法男女平等權利修正案,出於男性沙文主義而支持一夫多妻
=============================================================================
=============================================================================
親共商人當中，以何鴻燊和李嘉誠的表現最為突出。當董建華擔任特首之時，這兩位富豪都經常在公開場合發言，為董建華的政策護航。然而，當董建華失勢之時，二人立即透過各大電子傳媒放口風，暗示董建華已經失勢，並發表各種支持曾蔭權的宣言。而當曾蔭權當選以後，何鴻燊先生更公開發言，指自己這七年以來一直都要被逼昧著良心說瞎話，為董建華的政策護航, 其兩面的性格可想而見。
見 http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%9C%9F%E5%85%B1%E5%8B%A2%E5%8A%9B
二人旗下或與二人關係密切之企業
澳門旅遊娛樂股份有限公司
澳門博彩股份有限公司
澳門國際機場專營公司
誠興銀行
南灣發展有限公司
澳門漁人碼頭董事局
澳門賽馬會董事局
澳門逸園賽狗會
澳門回力球企業有限公司
澳門彩票有限公司
榮興彩票有限公司
長江實業
電訊盈科
和記黃埔
香港電燈公司
信德集團
噴射飛航
東華三院李嘉誠中學
Husky Energy In Canada
==============================================
will be continued
pls tell me any company that you think it is Bad too
Canon (至09年十月仍以成龍為中國市埸之代言人)
Baidu (多次以嚴重有違良如之手法打擊Google)
Cisco (又名思科，向PRC GOV提供過濾網絡之技術)
Kaspersky(雇用支持愚民者:成龍 其CEO呼吁采取网络实名制http://www.cnbeta.com/articles/95740.htm)
=============================================================================
*AgReserves Inc 美洲最大的核果生產廠商
*Beneficial Life 保險公司——約16億美元資產
*Bonneville International Corporation——美國第14大連鎖廣播電台公司
*Deseret Morning News（德撒律早報）——一份美國猶他州日報，該州第二大日報
*Deseret Cattle and Citrus Ranch （德撒律牧牛及柑橘農場），在佛羅里達州 Orlando （奧蘭多）——全世界最大的牧牛農場（1260平方公里），農場土地價值估計約8.58億美元
*Farmland Reserve, Inc
以上屬摩門教所有,該教20世紀後期強烈反對美國憲法男女平等權利修正案,出於男性沙文主義而支持一夫多妻
=============================================================================
=============================================================================
親共商人當中，以何鴻燊和李嘉誠的表現最為突出。當董建華擔任特首之時，這兩位富豪都經常在公開場合發言，為董建華的政策護航。然而，當董建華失勢之時，二人立即透過各大電子傳媒放口風，暗示董建華已經失勢，並發表各種支持曾蔭權的宣言。而當曾蔭權當選以後，何鴻燊先生更公開發言，指自己這七年以來一直都要被逼昧著良心說瞎話，為董建華的政策護航, 其兩面的性格可想而見。
見 http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%9C%9F%E5%85%B1%E5%8B%A2%E5%8A%9B
二人旗下或與二人關係密切之企業
澳門旅遊娛樂股份有限公司
澳門博彩股份有限公司
澳門國際機場專營公司
誠興銀行
南灣發展有限公司
澳門漁人碼頭董事局
澳門賽馬會董事局
澳門逸園賽狗會
澳門回力球企業有限公司
澳門彩票有限公司
榮興彩票有限公司
長江實業
電訊盈科
和記黃埔
香港電燈公司
信德集團
噴射飛航
東華三院李嘉誠中學
Husky Energy In Canada
==============================================
will be continued
pls tell me any company that you think it is Bad too
2009年7月10日星期五
Prop 8 : 最後 , 愚昧和狹獈再一次戰勝了理性,包容和愛
Prop 8,即美國加利福尼亞州08年的一項州憲法修正投票提案,該提案修訂州憲法以避免將同性伴侶的婚姻結合列為憲法權利，因此凌駕於婚姻平等案例的效力之上。
簡而言之,Gay同Lesbian唔可以結婚.支持e條提案嘅仆街主要係十字教同一夫多妻教(即係摩門教,該教在20世紀後期強烈反對美國憲法男女平等權利修正案),
身為異性戀男性的筆者不知道男人的胴體有何性感之處 , 正如同性戀男性的友人不好女色一樣,但作為一個人 , 筆者實在不能理解 , 絕不接受某些浪費八十四份一(每週兩小時)生命之徒 , 聽了一堆關於女人非人、拆毀人家祭壇的謬論後跑去剝削別人與生俱來的自由和權利,順帶一提,這些每周都去教堂的宗教狂熱份子有84%投票支持Prop 8.
接納其他人與自己不同之處,真的那麼困難嗎?
簡而言之,Gay同Lesbian唔可以結婚.支持e條提案嘅仆街主要係十字教同一夫多妻教(即係摩門教,該教在20世紀後期強烈反對美國憲法男女平等權利修正案),
身為異性戀男性的筆者不知道男人的胴體有何性感之處 , 正如同性戀男性的友人不好女色一樣,但作為一個人 , 筆者實在不能理解 , 絕不接受某些浪費八十四份一(每週兩小時)生命之徒 , 聽了一堆關於女人非人、拆毀人家祭壇的謬論後跑去剝削別人與生俱來的自由和權利,順帶一提,這些每周都去教堂的宗教狂熱份子有84%投票支持Prop 8.
接納其他人與自己不同之處,真的那麼困難嗎?
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)
